Jesse Mondry
by

suing you

The hemp-derived CBD market is a tough one right now. From uncertainty in when and how the FDA may begin regulating products, to the downturn in the stock markets as result of the coronavirus affecting the hemp industry, the problematic interim rules concerning hemp production and increasing state regulation, CBD companies face a plethora of issues in trying to turn a profit. Add increasing consumer class action litigation to the list – something we predicted several months ago.

Recently, Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc. (“CWB”) was served with a second consumer class action lawsuit alleging “multiple and prominent mislabeling” of certain products that “form a pattern of unlawful and unfair business practices that harm the public.” Benson v. Charlotte’s Web Holdings, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00418 (N.D. Ill.) (You can read about the first consumer class action lawsuit against Charlotte’s Web here). This new lawsuit, filed in the Northern District of Illinois, focuses on two products, “Soothing Scent Hemp Infused Cream” and “Unscented Hemp Infused Cream” (the “Products”).

The gravamen of the complaint is that CWB markets the Products online and on the product packaging as containing a certain amount of hemp extract, but the Products actually contain an amount of hemp extract significantly less than the amounts claimed by CWB in its marketing and labeling. In particular, the Complaint alleges CWB represents that the Products contain “750 MG Hemp Extract,” but several tests of the Products—done by a third-party laboratory most likely at the behest of the Plaintiffs—reveal that amount of hemp extract in the products ranged from 177.5 MG to 347.9 MG.

The Plaintiffs allege claims for breach of express warranty, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, unjust enrichment, and violation of several state consumer fraud acts. The Complaint claims that class damages exceed $5 million and seeks to recover monetary damages in an amount proven at trial and attorneys’ fees. (Feel free to email me for a copy of the complaint.)

If your company sells CBD products these lawsuits should concern you. Increasingly we work with clients who contract with one or more third parties for the manufacture, labeling and shipping and of CBD products. But if your company’s name is on the label or the product purchased through your website, you are at risk. Now is the time to revisit your contracts to ensure that the risk of the manufacturer failing to ensure the product contains the amount of CBD on your label falls on the manufacturer, not on you. Start with the defense and indemnity provisions in each of your contracts, and go from there!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

 
 

About this Blog

The Canna Law Blog™ is a forum for discussion about the practical aspects of cannabis law and how it impacts those involved in this growing industry. We will provide insight into how canna businesspeople can use the law to their advantage…

Read More

 
 

Stay Connected

   

 

SUBSCRIBE BY EMAIL

 
 

Topics

Archives

 
 
 
 

Disclaimer

Please be mindful that possessing, using, distributing and selling marijuana are all federal crimes and that this blog is not intended to give you any legal advice, much less lead you to believe that marijuana is legal under federal law.

 
 

COVID-19 Update: Since March 5, all of our attorneys and staff have been working remotely to ensure social distancing.
We are continuing to work on our clients’ matters and we are still accepting new clients. We are here for you.

 

You can reach us by phone at (206) 224-5657 or by email at firm@harrisbricken.com.

 

Stay healthy and stay safe!

Learn More
X